At this point you have taken the midterm and you should have turned in your first paper. Reflect on how these went. How do you feel that you did on the midterm? Did you study sufficiently? What might you change as you look toward the final exam (which is just six weeks away)? What about the paper – what went well and what didn’t go well? How will you improve on the next paper?
I think I passed the midterm! I would not go as far to say that I passed with flying colors because I do not think that at all!! I was not as prepared as I had thought I was for the midterm. As for my paper, based on how most do on their first paper in your class I was somewhat pleased. However I was not completely satisfied because I am used to getting A’s on my papers. For the midterm, I would have to blame a below standard grade on no one but myself. I had a fool-proof plan of studying and preparing myself for it during spring break and as soon as I got home, I totally dismissed it. However, when I got back to school I did buckle down and make flashcards and really studied the terms for the most part. However, I did not completely understand the concept of the theories. I think that hurt me on the paper as well as the test. Most of the theory portion on my test was left blank because I did not really understand what was going on when we had to write a thesis. To better understand I totally should have attempted it beforehand and asked for feedback from my professor, because that’s what a smart person would have done. However, I was incredibly lazy and I so did not do any of that. I did receive a little help from a friend of mine that also has the class and that helped some but not very much. For the final exam I will obviously prepare myself a lot more adequately a lot sooner. That is what really killed me for this first exam! I can retain a lot of information; I just did not completely absorb it. If I do this for the final exam I am sure that I will do very well on it. For the next paper, I plan to spend way more time writing it, and getting feedback before I completely turn my paper in to be graded.
Sunday, March 22, 2009
Blog 7
So far this semester I would like to say that I have made a good bit of progress. Before I came to this class, when I read I looked at the plot and the story structure and tried to analyze it and what the author was trying to say. However I really only looked at it from my views rather than a plethora of views. After being in the class for this long, I have begun to read even deeper into the stories that we read. I think about what was going on around the time of when the story was written and I think about whether or not a man or woman is writing the story. I have even begun to enjoy reading the scholarly articles and what these critics have gathered from analyzing the stories. It is really interesting to consider all of these different properties when reading the story because the story becomes much more complex and different to me had I just read the story for its plain literal meaning. I cannot say that I have noticed these developments crossing over into other areas of life, but it has made me a little more curious about everything. For instance, in my biology classes I will sometimes Google something that I have a hard time understanding or just do not know about. Before I would not do that; also when we read Sonny’s Blues I found myself Googling research on the story and its allusion to the bible when it talks about the “cup of trembling”. With that said, I still have a lot of improvements to make. I have a pretty hard time making it completely through the scholarly articles. They can be really long and even though they are interesting sometimes, they do not always keep my focus. I think if I centered more time around really focusing on what I’m reading and really understanding it thoroughly I would be able to accomplish a lot more a lot faster in this course.
Journal 6
Students always struggle a good deal with literary theory. What do you think of theory at this point? What do you think it is? How much sense does it make to you? What things are you doing to help yourself understand it more fully? And how would you describe your own “theory” of what literature is and how it works at this point?
At this point, literacy theory is still pretty new to me. We talk about it in class and we discuss what views each theory look at a story from, but sometimes, I still do not quite get it. I think the idea that you can use one specific view of a story and gain so much insight is really very neat. I really like the concept because it gives you a chance to really see different situations in a different type of person’s point of view. In my opinion a theory is basically a perspective that can be used to view a story. The theories themselves make a lot of sense to me. Like the ideas and concepts of each individual one. What I do not get is how to apply those in a paper. I do not know really how one would go about writing a paper and incorporating which theory they used to view the story and how that shaped their paper. I could not really understand whether you plainly state what theory you are using or if you just analyzed the story using that view and had that reflect in your paper. To understand the theories more fully I really have just been trying to go over the notes that we have taken in class and reading over what is in the book. To more fully understand I think I should probably read a few papers using different theories to see how to thoroughly understand and analyze literature. As far as my own theory goes, I like to read a story and see how it relates literally to what I have learned from life and also how it relates symbolically to what I have read about and what I have learned. I think that probably goes along with the new critics theory, but I am also pretty interested in how the author’s personal history can help to shape what happens in a story.
At this point, literacy theory is still pretty new to me. We talk about it in class and we discuss what views each theory look at a story from, but sometimes, I still do not quite get it. I think the idea that you can use one specific view of a story and gain so much insight is really very neat. I really like the concept because it gives you a chance to really see different situations in a different type of person’s point of view. In my opinion a theory is basically a perspective that can be used to view a story. The theories themselves make a lot of sense to me. Like the ideas and concepts of each individual one. What I do not get is how to apply those in a paper. I do not know really how one would go about writing a paper and incorporating which theory they used to view the story and how that shaped their paper. I could not really understand whether you plainly state what theory you are using or if you just analyzed the story using that view and had that reflect in your paper. To understand the theories more fully I really have just been trying to go over the notes that we have taken in class and reading over what is in the book. To more fully understand I think I should probably read a few papers using different theories to see how to thoroughly understand and analyze literature. As far as my own theory goes, I like to read a story and see how it relates literally to what I have learned from life and also how it relates symbolically to what I have read about and what I have learned. I think that probably goes along with the new critics theory, but I am also pretty interested in how the author’s personal history can help to shape what happens in a story.
Friday, March 6, 2009
Journal 5
You are being introduced to a lot of new terminology this semester, and you will be tested on the terms in the midterm and final exams. How are you preparing right now for this? Do you have a vocabulary study sheet? When you think about what you’ve read or when you take notes on the reading, do you use the new concepts and ideas? Do these concepts make sense to you? Do you find them useful? Talk about your relation to these new concepts and terms (such as “centered consciousness” or “New Criticism”).
I have a lot of new words to learn this semester. A lot of them I was already introduced to in high school. Especially the ones that are used to evaluate a story like the plot, and setting and all those terms. However, the theories are fairly new to me. In my AP lit class we talked about theories and which ones would be good to use for certain stories, but we did not talk about using them in analysis or how to use them in an analysis. I don't really understand this concept so I'm not really sure how to go about incorporating a theory throughout a paper, but I'm sure I will learn. Anyhow, to study for the terms and such, I started by looking over them and identifying words that I already knew. Then I used those definitions I already knew and compared them to the definitions given to us in the book and what I had written down in my notes. That way, I am able to come up with an accurate definition that I am also able to understand and really grasp. For the words that I did not know, I obviously looked them up in the book and tried to see what I could relate them to. I did this mostly with the theories. I picked something that I had read before or written before and saw how they were relative to eachother. This helped a lot! Most of the concepts and theories I can understand I just need a little more help knowing when to use them and how. Like the self/other theory which is post-structuralism, I get confused because sometimes I don't see exactly how it works when I'm reading the text. If someone were to tell me how it is illustrated then I could somewhat understand it, but if you asked me to explain it I would be completely lost. As for the terms though, knowing an example of each is helpful and it really aids my actual understand what is meant by the term. As long as I keep going over the words and writing down what I know, to help me remember, I'm pretty sure I will be able to do very well on the mid-term.
I have a lot of new words to learn this semester. A lot of them I was already introduced to in high school. Especially the ones that are used to evaluate a story like the plot, and setting and all those terms. However, the theories are fairly new to me. In my AP lit class we talked about theories and which ones would be good to use for certain stories, but we did not talk about using them in analysis or how to use them in an analysis. I don't really understand this concept so I'm not really sure how to go about incorporating a theory throughout a paper, but I'm sure I will learn. Anyhow, to study for the terms and such, I started by looking over them and identifying words that I already knew. Then I used those definitions I already knew and compared them to the definitions given to us in the book and what I had written down in my notes. That way, I am able to come up with an accurate definition that I am also able to understand and really grasp. For the words that I did not know, I obviously looked them up in the book and tried to see what I could relate them to. I did this mostly with the theories. I picked something that I had read before or written before and saw how they were relative to eachother. This helped a lot! Most of the concepts and theories I can understand I just need a little more help knowing when to use them and how. Like the self/other theory which is post-structuralism, I get confused because sometimes I don't see exactly how it works when I'm reading the text. If someone were to tell me how it is illustrated then I could somewhat understand it, but if you asked me to explain it I would be completely lost. As for the terms though, knowing an example of each is helpful and it really aids my actual understand what is meant by the term. As long as I keep going over the words and writing down what I know, to help me remember, I'm pretty sure I will be able to do very well on the mid-term.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)